Continuous-time Markov model with application to leprosy transmission dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64497/jssci.10Keywords:
continuous-time, Markov model, transmission, leprosy, neglected tropical diseasesAbstract
Leprosy is a public problem because of its latency, diagnosis, treatments and its transmission potential. It is considered as one of the neglected tropical diseases. Although remarkable effort has been made towards the control of leprosy, the burden of leprosy is still severe among population. A number of leprosy models exist but could not account for the proper transmission dynamics of leprosy. This study develops a Continuous-Time Markov Model to enhance the understanding of leprosy transmission dynamics, addressing limitations in prior models by integrating retreatment of relapse cases, undetected case detection, and disability progression. Extending the existing model framework, new compartments for diagnosed exposed individuals (Ed) and disabled populations (D) are introduced, alongside parameters such as case finding rates, treatment adherence, and relapse probabilities sourced from epidemiological data. We carried out a numerical simulation on the model where we obtained our sample paths/stochastic realization using Gillespie Algorithms with “Adaptivetau” package in R. The results of the sample paths reveal a decline in a population of Susceptible with an incline and decline among population of Exposed, Infected with Multibacillary, Infected with Paucibacillary, Exposed/detected diagnosed, Treated, Disable, Relapsed to Multibacillary and Relapse to Paucibacillary by varying the levels of leprosy interventions transmission parameters at fixed population. The model was also successfully fitted into data obtained from National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Programme for North East, Nigeria capturing the impact of control strategies for the transmission dynamics of leprosy.
Downloads
References
[1] Chiyaka, E. T. (2013). Theoretical assessment of the transmission dynamics of leprosy. Applied Mathematics, 4, 387–401. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.42059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.42059
[2] Fischer, E., Vlas, D. S., Meima, A., Habbema, D., &Richardus, J. (2010). Different mechanisms for heterogeneity in leprosy susceptibility can explain disease clustering within households. PLOS ONE, 5(11), e14061. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014061
[3] Giraldo, L. A. H., & Garcia, U. J. (2018). Multibacillary and paucibacillary leprosy dynamics: A simulation model including a delay. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 12(32), 1677–1685. https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2018.88121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2018.88121
[4] Holtrup, R., de Jonge, M., & Peters, M. (2015). Leprosy in the Flores Sea: An agent-based model [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Twente.
[5] Lechat, M. F., Misson, J. Y., &Vellut, C. M. (1974). An epidemetric model of leprosy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 51, 361–373.
[6] Meima, A., Smith, W. C. S., van Oortmarssen, J. H., Richardus, J. D. F., &Habbema, J. D. (2004). The future incidence of leprosy: A scenario analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(5), 373–380.
[7] Mushayabasa, S., & Bhunu, C. P. (2012a). Modelling the effects of chemotherapy and relapse on the transmission dynamics of leprosy. Mathematical Sciences, 6, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7456-6-12
[8] Mushayabasa, S., & Bhunu, C. P. (2012b). Modeling the impact of voluntary testing and treatment on tuberculosis transmission dynamics. International Journal of Biomath, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524511001726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524511001726
[9] Scollard, D. M., Adams, L. B., Gillis, T. P., Krahenbuhl, J. L., Truman, R. W., & Williams, D. L. (2006). The continuing challenges of leprosy. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 19(2), 338–381. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.2.338-381.2006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.2.338-381.2006
[10] Smith, R. L. (2016). Proposing a compartmental model for leprosy and parameterizing using regional incidence in Brazil. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(8), e0004925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004925
[11] Stephen, G., Christian, C., & Robert, S. (2010). Modeling the effects of stigma on leprosy [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Ottawa.
[12] Kubra, K. T. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of leprosy transmission with treatment through a fractal-fractional differential model. Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, 12, 100909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100909
[13] Martahi, R. L., & Tasman, H. (2021). Model of transmission of three types leprosy disease with treatment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1725(1), 012018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1725/1/012018
[14] Raza, A., & Rafiq, M. (2022). Modeling and transmission dynamics of leprosy disease: Via numerical methods. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 46, 279–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-021-01242-w
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliyu Usman Kinafa, John Ikemma Dike, Jibasen Danjuma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 215
- PDF 98
