The evolving patterns in economic volatility: a comparative regime analysis of pre- and post-crisis period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64497/jssci.106Abstract
Economic volatility modeling is a very crucial part of statistical finance and computational economics, with significant implications for risk management and policy formulation. This study presents a comparative analysis of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) All-Share Index across two distinct phases: a pre-crisis era and a post-crisis period characterized by significant macroeconomic and global disruptions. Employing the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) families for volatility estimation and a Markov Regime Switching (MRS) framework for regime identification, the research captures both continuous volatility dynamics and discrete shifts between high- and low-volatility states. Data preprocessing involved return computation, stationarity testing, and heteroskedasticity diagnostics. Findings shows that, a low mean return in both the pre- and post-crisis periods, confirming the absence of substantial average daily gains. However, standard deviation increased from (pre-crisis) to (post-crisis), pointing to heightened volatility in the latter period. The post-crisis results for GARCH (1, 1) model show and, implying slightly longer-lasting shocks compared to the pre-crisis values of EGARCH results highlight asymmetric volatility effects, with negative in the post-crisis period, indicating that negative shocks increase volatility more than positive ones. TGARCH results similarly confirm leverage effects. While, MRS shows that the transition probability matrix reveals that the probability of remaining in the low-volatility regime dropped from (pre-crisis) to (post-crisis), indicating heightened volatility persistence and extended high-volatility regimes in the post-crisis period, emphasizing the structural impacts of global shocks. The study contributes a replicable statistical-computational framework for volatility analysis in emerging markets.
Downloads
References
[1] P. O. Ezepue, T. C. Urama, and M. A. T. Omar, “Systematic Stock Market Characterisation and Development: Perspectives from Random Matrix Theory, Option Pricing, Genetics, and Global Economics,” J. Math. Financ., vol. 09, no. 02, pp. 105–151, 2019, doi: 10.4236/jmf.2019.92007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2019.92007
[2] A. Chaouch and S. Ben Sassi, “Interconnectedness of Stock Indices in African Economies Under Financial, Health, and Political Crises,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1–33, 2025, doi: 10.3390/jrfm18050238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050238
[3] O. S. Adegboyo and K. Sarwar, “Modelling and forecasting of Nigeria stock market volatility,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 11, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s43093-025-00536-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00536-4
[4] C. L. Sravanthi, J. N. Chandra Sekhar, N. C. Alluraiah, C. Dhanamjayud Stock Market Characterization of the Nigerian Stock Market,” no. April, 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23439.05280.
[5] K. A. Tahir, “A Systematic Review and Evolutionary Analysis of the Optimization Techniques and Software Tools in Hybrid Microgrid Systems,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18071770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071770
[6] A. S. Azad, N. Islam, N. Nabi, S. De Silva, and R. Sokkalingam, “Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Applications, and Challenges,” 2025, [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5292704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5292704
[7] H. Dallah and I. Adeleke, “Macorvian characteristics of the Nigerian stock market,” AFRREV STECH An Int. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 67–77, 2018, doi: 10.4314/stech.v7i2.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/stech.v7i2.7
[8] O. A. Adejumo, S. Albert, and O. J. Asemota, “Markov Regime-Switching Autoregressive Model of Stock Market Returns in Nigeria,” Cent. Bank Niger. J. Appl. Stat., no. Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 65–83, 2021, doi: 10.33429/cjas.11220.3/8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33429/Cjas.11220.3/8
[9] M. A. Raheem and P. O. Ezepue, “A Three-State Markov Model for Predicting Movements of Asset Returns of a Nigerian Bank,” CBN J. Appl. Stat., vol. 7, no. 2, 2016.
[10] T. Bollerslev, “Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity,” J. Econom., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 307–327, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
[11] R. F. Engle, “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 987, 1982, doi: 10.2307/1912773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
[12] S. M. Sharifhosseini et al., “Investigating Intelligent Forecasting and Optimization in Electrical Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Applications,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 21, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17215385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215385
[13] P. Petkov, M. Shopova, T. Varbanov, E. Ovchinnikov, and A. Lalev, “Econometric Analysis of SOFIX Index with GARCH Models,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 17, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jrfm17080346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080346
[14] D. Léber, · Balázs Egyed, D. Léber, and B. Egyed, “The Sentiment Augmented GARCH-LSTM Hybrid Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting 1 3 Keywords Value-at-risk · Twitter sentiments · News sentiments · GARCH-LSTM hybrid model,” 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11042-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11042-8
[15] K. Kakade, I. Jain, and A. K. Mishra, “Value-at-Risk forecasting: A hybrid ensemble learning GARCH-LSTM based approach,” Resour. Policy, vol. 78, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102903
[16] S. M. Khan et al., “A Systematic Review of Disaster Management Systems: Approaches, Challenges, and Future Directions,” Land, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: 10.3390/land12081514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081514
[17] R. O.-I. R. of B. R. Papers and undefined 2009, “Stock return, volatility and the global financial crisis in an emerging market: The Nigerian case,” CiteseerRA OloweInternational Rev. Bus. Res. Pap. 2009•Citeseer, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 426–447, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=796ab37c2e7add5c7fb48c7e57b96345f84ef381
[18] P. O. Ezepue and A. W. Babayemi, “Volatility Modelling and Stock Market Characterisation of the Nigerian Stock Market for the Pre-2004 Bank Reforms Period,” no. April, 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13372.72326.
[19] J. W. Muteba Mwamba and S. M. Mwambi, “Assessing market risk in brics and oil markets: An application of markov switching and vine copula,” Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijfs9020030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9020030
[20] K. Kakade, A. K. Mishra, K. Ghate, and S. Gupta, “Forecasting Commodity Market Returns Volatility: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning GARCH-LSTM based Approach,” Intell. Syst. Accounting, Financ. Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2022, doi: 10.1002/isaf.1515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1515
[21] D. Karnehm, A. Samanta, L. Anekal, S. Pohlmann, A. Neve, and S. Williamson, “Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Deep-Learning-Based State-of-Charge Estimation Algorithms for Cloud-Based Lithium-Ion Battery Management Systems,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 597–604, 2024, doi: 10.1109/jestie.2024.3373267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTIE.2024.3373267
[22] M. Hasan et al., “A state-of-the-art comparative review of load forecasting methods: Characteristics, perspectives, and applications,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 26, no. February, p. 100922, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100922
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Peace Ifeoluwa Ikuforiji, Tolulope Olayemi James, Gelwasa Yabani Galadima

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 182
- PDF 82

