A comparative study of 4th-order and 6th-stage 5th-order Runge-Kutta methods for solving autonomous differential equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64497/jssci.52Keywords:
autonomous differential equation , initial value problem , Runge-Kutta method, absolute errorAbstract
In this study, we utilized the Sixth-Stage Fifth-Order Runge-Kutta method and the Fourth-Order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method to address First-Order Autonomous Differential Equations with Initial Value Problems (IVPs). Both methods demonstrate considerable efficacy and are well-suited for resolving challenges encountered in engineering and scientific contexts. To evaluate the accuracy of the numerical solutions obtained, we compared the approximate results with exact solutions, revealing a strong correlation between the two. Additionally, we analyzed the error terms associated with both methods and provided a comparative evaluation using a relevant example.
Downloads
References
[1] F. Rabiei, F. Ismail, Fifth-order improved Runge-Kutta method for solving ordinary differential equations,
in: Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Applied computer science, 2011, pp. 129–
133.
[2] J. Butcher, On fifth order Runge-Kutta methods, BIT Numerical Mathematics 35 (2) (1995) 202–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737162
[3] M. A. Islam, A comparative study on numerical solutions of initial value problems (IVP) for ordinary differential equations (ODE) with Euler and Runge-Kutta methods, American Journal of Computational Mathematics 5 (03) (2015) 393–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2015.53034
[4] J. C. Butcher, On Runge-Kutta processes of high order, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society 4 (2) (1964) 179–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700023387
[5] J. C. Butcher, A history of Runge-Kutta methods, Applied numerical mathematics 20 (3) (1996) 247–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9274(95)00108-5
[6] M. A. Islam, Accuracy analysis of numerical solutions of initial value problems (IVP) for ordinary differential equations (ODE), IOSR Journal of Mathematics 11 (3) (2015) 18–23.
[7] D. Goeken, O. Johnson, Runge–Kutta with higher order derivative approximations, Applied Numerical Mathematics 34 (2-3) (2000) 207–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(99)00128-2
[8] J. D. Lambert, Computational methods in ordinary differential equations, (No Title) (1973).
[9] M. Kerimov, Modern numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (1980). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(80)90334-1
[10] J. H. Mathews, Numerical methods for mathematics, science and engineering, Vol. 10, Prentice-Hall International, 1992.
[11] G. Agbeboh, L. Adoghe, M. Ehiemua, B. Ononogbo, On the derivation of a sixth-stage fifth-order Runge–Kutta method for solving initial value problems in ordinary differential equations, American Journal of Sciences and Engineering Research 3 (5) (2020) 29–41.
[12] M. B. Hossain, M. J. Hossain, M. M. Miah, M. S. Alam, A comparative study on fourth order and butcher’s fifth order Runge-Kutta methods with third order initial value problem (IVP), Applied and Computational Mathematics 6 (6) (2017) 243–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.acm.20170606.12
[13] M. S. Banu, I. Raju, S. Mondal, A comparative study on classical fourth order and butcher sixth order Runge-Kutta methods with initial and boundary value problems, Int J Mat Math Sci 3 (2021) 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34104/ijmms.021.08021
[14] F. K. Iyanda, T. A. Tunde, U. Isa, Numerical comparison of Runge-Kutta (rk5) and new iterative method (nim) for solving metastatic cancer model, Malaysian Journal of Computing (MJoC) 6 (1) (2021) 758–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/mjoc.v6i1.10359
[15] K. J. Audu, O. Babatunde, A comparative analysis of two semi-analytic approaches in solving systems of first-order differential equations, Scientific Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University 7 (1) (2024) 8–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70030/sjmakeu.1433801
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Auwal Lawan, Abubakar Salihu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 512
- PDF 421

